It is ever so wonderful to check notifications and discover the nomination of a blogger award. This one comes from AJ Jenner. She is doing what most of us writers would like to do–take a sabbatical from the workaday world and she is seriously pursuing writing. Yay and hooray to live out that goal. News update: she just won a screenwriting contest. Double hooray!
I’m a little fuzzy about the requirements of this award and so I will wing it (as usual).
First off: what have I been up to lately? Hmmm, besides grading papers until my eyes and resolve give out, I’ve managed to smush in some fun stuff:
read a few books: Their Eyes Were Watching God (a possible text for AP literature), Insurgent (been waiting almost a year for the sequel to Divergent) .
watch a few DVDs: Inception (again). Flyboys (for my seniors as a means of emphasizing how WWI experience shifted the world’s paradigm and changed literature forever), Miracle Worker, Romeo and Juliet (both for classes, yet I don’t mind how many times I’ve watched them), Their Eyes Were Watching God (almost as good as the book), Garrow’s Law (series based on real life of the English lawyer who began defense for the prosecuted in 18th century).
garden–although I’m not enjoying it quite like I used to. Score? Weeds 5, Me-1
gelato walks: on Fridays they offer fruit flavors (strawberry on top and chocolate on the bottom…yummmmy)
procrastinate about editing my YA novel that needs to be sent off to a publisher I discovered at a recent writing conference.
Oh, and nap. I turned to chocolate to relieve the stress of end-of-the year teaching, and gained two pounds. Napping seems to be working better. Somewhere I read that those who nap lose weight. I still prefer chocolate though.
Another part of the award is to nominate other blogs? I don’t know how many we are supposed to nominate so I will offer up those blogs who regularly respond and drop by:
And I do so appreciate my readers, so if I left you off the list, my apologies. I really need to finish this so I can take my Sunday nap. Either that or I will succumb to popping down to the store for chocolate.
Today will the last day of the Romeo and Juliet unit for my freshmen. We will end it appropriately with an Insult-o-Rama, which is basically a member from each designated family, Montague vs Capulet, stepping up to the line in our market square and squaring off with insults ala Bard. You know the ones:
“Thou art an apish, lily-livered bed presser.” If that one doesn’t sting enough:
“Thou be an insolent foot-licking parasite.” These go beyond thumb-biting, and it is all in good fun. I keep my door shut just in case, as it does get a bit loud.
My focus when studying Romeo and Juliet is not so much as an introduction and exploration of Shakespeare’s famous play, it is more of an exploration and introduction to Shakespeare himself. Surprisingly, my freshmen come to class with about a teaspoonful of knowledge about him. Then again, I didn’t have any exposure to Shakespeare until I began teaching him. I had heard of him, of course, but I didn’t really believe he had much physical substance. I placed him a little bit above the Loch Ness monster in that there might be evidence of his existence, but not totally proven. After about ten years into teaching Shakespeare I believe a bit more and in fact have become a proponent of making sure my students appreciate his genius. Please, no theories on Bacon and company and “Will the real Will please stand up, please” comments. I think his plays, sonnets, and poems rock.
And so our curriculum starts with Romeo and his Juliet. I guess two teenagers who are heck-bent on breaking rules by disobeying parents, state law and such still resonates with the teens today. It makes sense, since if we started off with Macbeth they might go into spasms of cerebral overload. We start them off gently. Good call, curriculum powers that be.
Overall, we read a little, act it out a little, and watch different versions. By the end of the unit most of them can understand Shakespearean language without consulting their No Fear Shakespeare interpretations. Some students go into unattractive fits of eye-rolling and twitching at the thought that they will study Shakespeare in their sophomore and senior year. I don’t know why we skip him their junior year. American Lit studies have no room for him I guess.
There are many faces of Romeo, and both the girls and guys relate to his brash impetuosity. Who wouldn’t want to be that in love? Oh, Romeo, thou art timeless.
I leave off with some of the many faces of Romeo with his Juliet:
Too Big To Know by David Weinberger certainly does give a person something to think about. If the book title doesn’t intrigue you, move on to the subtitle:
Rethinking Knowledge
Now That the Facts Aren’t the Facts,
Experts Are Everywhere,
and the Smartest Person in the Room
Is the Room
I think entire college course could be dedicated to the subtitle alone.
Speaking of colleges, specifically universities, it makes sense Weinberger is the person to write a book about how the Internet has impacted our knowledge since he is a Senior Researcher at Harvard University’s Berkman Center for the Internet & Society. He knows what he is talking about when it comes to the Internet and how it is shaping our thinking, and that’s what this book is all about: how the Internet is reshaping our thinking.
From the inside book flap:
We used to know how to know. We got our answers from books or experts. We’d nail down the facts and move on. But in the Internet age, knowledge has moved onto networks. There’s more knowledge than ever, of course, but its different. (emphasis added)
It is different. It’s instant. And we all know from downing ramen, micro meals, and breakfast in a glass, that instant is not better–it’s quicker, yes, but overall it lacks something in the quality aspect of satisfaction.
Let’s wind up the Victrola, please….Back in my day (yada yada). But it’s true, back in school, you know prior to the ’80s and desktop computers and Internet access, a student had to GO to the library and look up information in almanacs, encyclopedias, and in expert-crafted tomes of knowledge. I don’t think our school library even owns an encyclopedia set anymore. Librarian: Just go look it up on the computer. In fact, I think the school library has become a computer lab adorned with fiction, since the non-fiction is ignored and passed over for the Internet click instead.
After reading Weinberger’s book I feel my long held opinion is validated: we are becoming stupider. I tell my students all the time how our brain is a muscle. If we don’t exercise our muscles they atrophy. I know my brain is getting flabby. One example is my lack of data bank of memorized phone numbers. Why should I when I can speed dial? Yet, before I rant about the overkill of technology and how it is breeding a stupider instead of brainer society let me let Weinberger point out his thoughts:
page xii (even before he starts the book) The Internet is an unedited mash of rumor, gossips, and lies. It splinters our attention and spells the end of reflective, long-form thought…Everyone with any stupid idea has a megaphone as big as that of educated, trained people.We form “echo chambers” online and actually encounter fewer challenges to our thinking than we did during the broadcast era. Google is degrading our memories. Google is making us stupid. The Internet loves fervid, cult-driven amateurs and drives professionals out of business.
Image via CrunchBase
Before we pack up our Macs, trade in our iPhones, and blast Microsoft and totally castigate technology, let’s step back, take a breath and rethink knowledge. Here is the big question: how much do we need to know? This is what Weinberger explores throughout his book.
In Chapter Nine he brings up the million dollar question: Are the changes in knowledge good or bad? I dunno–are they? All I know is what I learned and most of my learning has come from reading, not from zipping and schlipping and sedgwaying my way across the knowledge-littered frontier of cyber space. I feel drained and mentally fatigued after I have spent an hour kibitzing on the computer. Kind of like eating a bag of Cheetos when I should have been eating a salad but didn’t want to take the time to create something nutritious. The analogy tie is that although Cheetos could be considered food it doesn’t have a lasting effect when it comes to nourishment; it’s not at all like savoring a lovely garden salad laden with veggies and topped with sunflower seeds. Seeking information via the Internet for me, most of the time, is eating a bag of Cheetos. I keep eating, but I’m still hungry even after the bag is done. Books are salad in that the bulk goes down and stays down and feeds the body (lettuce and pages–it works).
All I can say is the whole “Is the Internet enlivening or depriving our brains” question brings me back to the short story By the Waters of Babylon” Do you know the passage I’m alluding to? The one where the protagonist looks around at the remains of the once great society and wonders, “Did they eat their knowledge too fast?”
It makes me wonder–are we eating our knowledge too fast?
I know I am banging my own drum since I am a teacher. Yet, I want to recognize how teachers have affected my own life, and if you stop and give it some thought, somewhere along the way a teacher made a difference in your life. If you can read, write, add, subtract, multiply, and point out where Taiwan is on the map, you more than likely can thank a teacher for that ability.
NOTE: Teachers aren’t only found in the classroom. Parents are teachers. Siblings are teachers. Community leaders like those who invest their time in Scouts and 4H are teachers. I see teachers as those individuals who impart a skill, a value, an idea to others. I’ve had some amazing teachers along the way, and because learning is something that is a life long adventure I know I will have many other teachers in my life. Sometimes I even learn something from my students.
So–have you thanked a teacher today?
Looking to be inspired or be reminded of teachers and their impact upon our lives? Consider one these books (Barnes and Noble images):
Having recently plunked out my series list caused me to wonder about creating other lists. Yes, I am a confessed list maker. I have Post-It squares tacked all over the place of To-Dos, Epiphanies, Story Starts, Poem Parts, and Lesson Plan Pundits. The Cricket List will be an on-going project. Today’s offering is #4: Required reading in high school English. I encourage your suggestions:
The Cricket List:
1. Children’s authors and selected titles
2. YA authors and selected titles
3. Picture books
4. Required reading in high school English:
The Outsiders(teens haven’t changed too much in the thirty years this has been out)
The Miracle Worker (Helen Keller is a hero favorite and goes a long way in learning about overcoming adversity)
Pride and Prejudice (all man/woman hate-at-first sight movies stem from this gem)
Sherlock Holmes (the original, to understand why Robert Downey and Jude Law’s version is pure entertainment)
Frankenstein (a riveting read and shows the fallacy of Hollywood’s meddling)
The Ides of March have come and gone and so as the unit on Julius Caesar. Between Odysseus, Hamlet, and the Roman senate I feel I have been wading in testosterone for a month. Lots of wanderlust, stabbings, and confused emotions of doing the right thing. Next month it’s satire, heroes, and star-crossed lovers, which should provide a decent change up of scenery.
I learned my lesson about front loading Caesar a few years ago when I first started teaching the play to sophomores. I thought my students knew all about Julius Caesar. Wrong, so wrong. Roman history is not a featured item in most history books up to ninth grade, and it’s not much of a feature in high school at all–that is, unless students opt for World History as one of their electives, and even then not a lot of time is part on the Roman Empire. This is why there wasn’t much impact when the protagonist is bumped off by the second act. Why should my students care about the hero dying when they hardly know him?
Speed it up a few years, interject some marketing savvy, and Julius Caesar becomes a dynamic unit. My recipe for getting kids to care about Gaius Julius Caesar.
1. Show a Hollywood version of Caesar that is colorful, even though historical correct: baiting the hook
Jeremy Sisto plays a likable Caesar. I play the movie up to the point of where Caesar returns to Rome after Gaul, receiving the cheers of the Romans and the news that Pompey has fled, fearing for his life. This builds up intrigue and my students better understand what is going on when we began reading the play.
2. Fishing for interest: Assign parts, upping the reluctance with bonus reading points.
After writing the parts on the whiteboard I stand back and let my students sign up for who they want to read. Equal voice prevails in that it’s okay for guys to read female parts and vice versa. I’ve had some lovely deep-voiced Portias, and some commanding lighter-toned Cassius readers. Shakespeare would understand the need to pinch-hit.
3. We read up to the assassination. I used to include it as part of the agenda, yet my wanna be thespians somehow couldn’t do the death scene with proper dignity. I decided to give that over to the more experienced. There are a number of productions to choose from, although I keep with the tried and true John Gielgud version.
4. After each act we have class discussions about themes, issues, and notables. This is my favorite part, getting students to realize how history has shaped the world they live in. Events of a thousand years ago still echo down the corridors of their everyday life. We discuss ideas such as: Is murder ever valid? Do political leaders always act in the best interests of their country? Are beliefs worth dying for? These fifteen year old minds begin grasping the need to be informed and how being informed influences the vote they will cast in three years.
5. Once the play is packed up, the packet turned in, I reel in my students as we move on to the really fun stuff: Who was Caesar? I want my students to understand his far-reaching influence (beyond calendars, salads, and quippy quotes) and get to know the man and form their own opinion about him. I know Shakespeare had his reasons for not including Cleopatra in the play; however, Cleo cannot be ignored. So she gets showcased because she was a larger-than-life influence on Caesar:
I annoy my students with all kinds of move trivia: costs (1 million to Liz–a shocking amount; 44 million to make–equaling about 300 million today); tracheotomy scars (Liz almost died, you know); thousands of extras (pinch police to protect the ladies); real sets (CGI in ’63?). Grand stuff, indeed.
I also slip in a documentary with the idea that Hollywood and history don’t always see eye to eye on the truth.
The Sparknotes folk have done a really new cool thing by creating learning videos. This one was also helpful:
Then the assignment: Write an opinion essay on who you believe Caesar to be? Was he a megalomaniac who murdered for his own means? A philandering player who used women as stepping-stones to increased power? A frustrated tyrant? A genius strategist? A leader cut short in his prime? I guess the term is officially called synthesizing–gathering all the evidence and sifting it to form a valid opinion. Kind of like suffering through election year.
The play itself is not one of my favorites: “Hey, I’ll stab you, you stab me, will all die so nobly.” A little too gritty for my tastes. I do find a fascination in Caesar and I look forward to reading those essays.
In our district it’s mandated we have our objectives up on the board so that all may see what it is we are trying to get our students to learn. Mine for the Julius Caesar unit?
May my students learn from the experiences of the past in order to better apply the knowledge that is gained