Lite vs Literary
It’s often my dilemma when I’m shopping at my local library for my weekly rations of reading material: do I go lite or go literary?
Almost sounds like choosing cheesecake, doesn’t it? Go for less calories and sacrifice taste? It does apply to reading.
Before I offend too many people (hoping I haven’t offended anyone yet by saying your reading material choice is tasteless), let’s define literary merit. This is from a 2010 article by College Board’s Advanced Placement folk, the same people who run all those smartypants AP classes that students take and hope to learn enough to do well when they take those really tough and excruciating exams in May:
The Definition of Literary Merit in work of literature:
- Entertains the reader and is interesting to read.
- Does not merely conform to the expectations of a single genre or formula.
- Has been judged to have artistic quality by the literary community (teachers, students, librarians, critics, other writers, the reading public).
- Has stood the test of time in some way, regardless of the date of publication.
- Shows thematic depth: themes merit revisiting and study because they are complex and nuanced.
- Demonstrates innovation in style, voice, structure, characterization, plot and/or description.
- May have a social, political or ideological impact on society during the lifetime of the author or a erward.
- Does not fall into the traps of “pulp” ction such as clichéd or derivative descriptions and plot devices, or sentimentality rather than “earned” emotion.
- Is intended by the author to communicate in an artistic manner.
- Is universal in its appeal (i.e., the themes and insights are not only accessible to one culture or time period.
My students tend to get in a snit when we start discussing novels appropriate for in-depth study which they can refer to on the May exam. Inevitably Harry Potter comes up. I’m certainly not passing judgement on the popular wizard-boy–I just hold the book up against the list. The snitting does not quell. Potter fans do not easily diminish their devotion. I always leave the decision up to them. After all, the exam is three hours and nearly a hundred dollars, if Harry means that much to them, they can exercise their option. Personally, if going for risky entries I would choose Bradbury’s F451.
Back to my off duty reading choices.
As an AP literature teacher, I try to practice what I teach. After a long and fulfilling week of extolling Hamlet to my students, I’m ready to unwind with a plot of my own selection. I have a long list of meritable titles I want and need to read, yet I’m sidetracked by titles that require minimal effort since the plot is as thin as the page it’s printed on. It’s rather nice not having to struggle through ponderous diction, and nuances of layered theme. Coasting and flipping. Much like reaching for that cheese danish when I should sit down to a salad.
I end up with a compromise. For every book that meets most of the Lit Mer test, I drop in a mystery or a Chick Lit, or a dystopian YA. Or even a Kid Lit because I have yet to fully embrace grown up reads as being my only option.
And I hope my students don’t surprise me in the checkout line. Then again maybe I would earn cool teacher points when they realize that reading is the ability of flexible options. That is nothing to be embarrassed about.Shakespeare does manage to find a way into my reading–be it historical or a plot where Ophelia finds herself a happy ending with Horatio.
Maybe our reading lives mirror our actual lives. Sometimes we’re all about the merit; sometimes we just need to stay in shallow waters.
I agree. There is always the right book ready to meet our needs.
Yes, Shakespeare’s lost years does sound like formula fiction hahaha. I like light reading as a break, too. Too much of either weighty tomes or cozies makes me a dull girl.
The supposition of his lost years especially penned by Falstaff would bridge between the two, wouldn’t it?
He ought to know since he showed up so often ;)!
It’s odd to me how I can love a particular type of book for long stretches of time, then suddenly lose my taste for it. I went through an Amish phase, but rarely read them anymore. And there was a time when I could appreciate fantasy, but now I’m just not interested. Perhaps they’ll cycle back around! (And as a recovering English major I do try to check of a couple of “should” reads every year.)
I relate. I used to read and review Bethany House books almost exclusively, became disenchanted and drifted away. However, there is this new-to-me author who writes about West Virginia that has caught my interest.
I try to read non-fiction but it takes so long and feels like work instead of fun. There are so many interesting books out there, yet I want to drift and not have to row when reading these days.
I’ve being reading Malcolm Gladwell, and as entertaining and informative that he is, I still can’t go as long as a novel.
I can relate to this on so many levels! I do read quite a lot of literary fiction, but sometimes I just need something a bit lighter to balance it out. I like your compromise. 🙂
Why limit yourself to lite vs literary in this way? It seems to me that in thinking about books in such black and white terms, you deprive yourself (and perhaps your students) of excellent reading opportunities and critical thinking activities.
Though I am an avid reader myself, I feel that this stark view of reading deprived me of any aspects of literary study in my life. I never cared might for literary study in high school. Why should I have? I have dyslexia, and reading is harder for me, so I aim for books that I know I will love. I hated every great literary work that we read in English class, and thus assumed that I hated everything to do with literary study. After making it through most of my college education, it was pointed out to me that my favorite books have lots of literary merit, and I was overlooking to the whole time! After this discovery, I’ve fallen deeply in love with literary study.
I can think of many “lite” reads that fit almost all of the criteria on this list of what makes a work literary. My question for you is, does a book absolutely have to hit all items on the list to be literary? I can think of several canonical and great literary works that do not. Does this make them non literary?
Great feedback–reading for pleasure and reading an assigned book unfortunately aren’t always options for students, since being told to read a book is different; however, I have had many students end up enjoying their assigned books–To Kill a Mockingbird, The Alchemist, to name a couple. When it comes to lite and literary and AP classes, it is important that students are selecting novels if merit in order to write essays if depth, so “hitting” most of the marks on the suggested list is essential when reading for analysis. Fortunately, there are some amazing books that are literary merit.
Thanks for contributing your thoughts.