Pam Webb

a writer's journey as a reader

A Phoney Policy


Busted, ET–caught during class

ET would not be able to phone home if he were attending certain schools, school districts, and even some states. The cell phone debate once again hits the news as the controversy over phones in class continues.

According to Education Week, “By 2020, 77 percent of schools had prohibited non-academic use of cellphones during school hours, according to federal data.” In my twenty years of teaching I would say cell phone usage remained one of the biggest challenges when it came to student behavior. I remember when the first cell phone went off in my class (when only a few students had them). As I reminded the student to mute her phone she tersely replied, “It’s my grandma. She’s dying. I have to take this.” How am I supposed to enforce a policy contending with that kind of situation?

Phone policies have come and gone, and I am so glad I no longer have to deal with students and their phones. Although retired from teaching now, I remain interested in educational trends, and I can’t help but wonder at the shifting back to school districts adopting stronger cell phone policies.

Granted, cell phones have their use in the classroom; the problem is their potential for positive contributions is abused. Texting, gaming, scrolling, uploading, shaming are distractors and are distractions to the learning environment. While the intent of full, partial, or limited use is debated the real issue is enforcement.

Here are some problems with implementing a school phone policy:

  • Everyone has to be on board. Consistency is paramount to success. As a high school teacher I adhered to the school’s policy. Verbal reminders, posters, follow through—Yup. Other teachers not following the policy weren’t as much as a problem as the off-campus adults: parents, employers, medical appointments. One parent said, “I only leave a text to call me at lunch.” The problem is that when students feel or hear that “ping” they are programmed to check their phone like two-legged Pavlov puppies.
“But I need to answer it!”
  • Speaking of noticing students checking their phones, that leads into how odious it is to become the Phone Police. It is more likely a student is willing to give a pint of blood then surrender their phone. There is an addiction issue. It’s very real.
Plugged in
  • Once a phone is confiscated it demonstrates the consequences of disregarding the policy, right? Not really. Our school office manager showed me the desk drawer of confiscated electronics (ear buds are on the “no no” list as well). Instead of parents coming to school and picking up the phone they write it off as lost utilizing their phone insurance.
  • Phone policies are double-edged. School staff get to have their phones (unless the school policy is really hard-edged), which illustrates the irritating adage of “do as I say, not as I do“ that widens the gap of responsibility and respect between teachers and students.
  • Our school did modify its phone policy after it became apparent that a draconian approach was doomed. Leaving it up to individual teachers ended up as the soft approach.
Oh, for the good old days of being the only one to have a phone in class

My approach was a placing a poster in a prominent place which listed the classroom phone policy, mainly that phones needed to be out of sight during instructional time. There were times students could engage with their phones—for instance after ALL their was completed. The goal was to implement the need of discernment—there are good, better, and inappropriate times to use phones. At the high school level students are gaining book knowledge, but they are also gaining social skills. Allowing them to exercise self-control with their phones better prepares them to become responsible citizens. If seventeen year olds lack discernment when using their phones I can’t imagine what it must be like encountering seven year olds with phones, let alone a twelve year old.

Phones are here to stay. Phone policies will come and go. Perhaps those who are making decisions about policies should approach the issue as the phone not being the problem so much as how/when to utilize the phone. Phone etiquette is something that should taught right along with decimal points and comma usage. Maybe there is an app for that.

“What’s Appening with you?”

Single Post Navigation

6 thoughts on “A Phoney Policy

  1. petespringer's avatarpetespringerauthor on said:

    I know this is a huge issue. One solution that I see some districts using is having a pocket folder near the front of the room. Students are to put their phone in their numbered pockets as they enter the classroom. That way kids can still use their phones between classes. Those who violate the rules get their phone taken away until their parents come to school to retrieve them. I’m sure it’s not perfect, but it’s a lot better than having no checks and balances.

    • We had some teachers (math, for some reason) use this system. The problem is that if someone takes someone else’s phone the teacher could be held liable. Case in point—I confiscated a phone, put it on my desk, and someone took it. Such problems a teacher shouldn’t have to deal with🤨 Were cell phones a problem at your grade level?

      • petespringer's avatarpetespringerauthor on said:

        Nope, cellphones weren’t popular when I was teaching 5th and 6th grade. (That gives some idea of how many years ago that was.) 🤣 Then I worked at the K-3 school in the district. Some of my 3rd graders had phones, but the school rule was that kids had to turn them into the office at the beginning of the day. The thing about kids that age is they’re usually cooperative.

      • Third grade😳

  2. cathyjcain's avatarCathy J. Cain on said:

    In church this week I saw a parent remove a phone from his teen age daughter’s hand to pay attention. He is over the road traveling work father and she needed to be a daughter while he is home. She threw a fit. Phones are important in their place.

    cjsmissionaryministry@gmail.com

Leave a reply to Pam Webb Cancel reply